Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sutton Spring Wood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Sutton-cum-Duckmanton. MBisanz ^talk 01:27, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sutton Spring Wood[edit]

Article clearly does not and will not claim notability. It's about a street with five houses on it. No more buildings than that, no historical or literary significance claimed whatsoever. It even claims that few of the residents in the closest community know it exists, which essentially describes itself as non-notable. Khalfani Khaldun 04:18, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Merge/redirect to Sutton-cum-Duckmanton - it certainly exists as a named locality, see here and here, but there seems little prospect of enough that can be said to support its own page. TerriersFan (talk) 23:29, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as TerriersFan. A hamlet of five houses can hardly be considered notable by its existence alone. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge probably more than five houses but no shops, pubs or churches, and not a separate parish. This should probably be merged, as there doesn't appear to be enough that can be said about it for a separate article to be needed. —Snigbrook 22:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.